|

Most clinicians would like some ideas for improving their patients' experience with prescription drugs. If you are dismayed by the
confusing pharmaceutical messages bombarding clinicians and consumers, let SmartPrescribe aid you in sorting through the
claims.
SmartPrescribe is an online educational curriculum designed to help you optimize your prescribing. Through a series of convenient
lessons developed by academic, noncommercial experts, you can hone your ability to assess the drug-related information that you
receive in your practice. SmartPrescribe fits easily into your busy schedule and allows you to complete the lessons at your own
pace.
Upon finishing the curriculum, you will be better positioned to evaluate information from multiple sources to make treatment
decisions for your patients based on the most credible scientific evidence available.
 |
Click on the questions below
to see how
SmartPrescribe
can help you. |
 |
Can I distinguish good drug studies from not-so-good drug studies?
Industry-sponsored studies often favor the sponsor's product. Can you distinguish between real science and pseudo science? Can you identify the strengths and weaknesses in studies reported in journals?
Can you find the six problems with this clinical trial report?
A report from a randomized clinical trial of drug Xeta
in a leading medical journal concluded that the drug reduced mortality by 25%
in patients with toxic soritis. Nine of the 1,000
patients allocated to Xeta died compared to 12 of the 1,000 patients in
the comparison group given drug Omega. One hundred sixty Xeta patients
developed adverse effects and dropped out early after enrollment compared to 79 in the Omega group. Vital status was monitored among all participants who remained
on active treatment. The trial was sponsored by the manufacturer of Xeta. The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.
> Click here for the answers.
- Although the relative difference in mortality was 25% (1.2% vs.
0.9%), this difference is not statistically significant. Therefore, it is
incorrect to conclude that there was a difference in mortality. However,
the absolute difference was only 0.3%.
- In addition, since the comparison group was given another drug (Omega),
the observed mortality difference could have been due to an increased mortality
in this group. There is no assurance that the Xeta represented a safe
and effective treatment of toxic soritis.
- The high and differential drop-out rate is a concern, especially if
the vital status was not determined in patients who did not complete the study. One would expect deaths to occur among the drop-outs and these would increase
the reported number of deaths (9 vs. 12).
- The publication of an article in a reputable medical journal is
no guarantee of its quality.
- An extensive literature review of clinical trial findings
reported that industry-sponsored trials are up to three times more likely to
show favorable results to the sponsor compared to non-industry sponsored
trials.
- The reported lack of conflict of interest could be questioned
because the trial was sponsored by industry.
Learn more. Go to Lesson 1: A Clinician's Guide to Clinical Appraisal of Clinical Trials. Take for CME || Take without CME.
> Go to the next question.
|
 |
Should I feel comfortable prescribing new drugs on the market to my patients?
|
 |
Can I tell what is wrong with this drug company ad?
|
 |
How much am I influenced by pharmaceutical marketing?
|
 |
Am I prescribing dangerous combinations of drugs?
|
If you have asked yourself the preceding questions, then the SmartPrescribe curriculum
can aid you in finding the answers. Go to SmartPrescribe now. |